{"id":87,"date":"2021-01-19T08:54:55","date_gmt":"2021-01-19T08:54:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/suren.av.tr\/blog\/?p=87"},"modified":"2021-01-19T17:09:42","modified_gmt":"2021-01-19T17:09:42","slug":"hakimin-vekilin-mazeret-dilekcesini-delillendirmesini-istemeden-mazereti-reddetmesi-bozma-sebebidir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/suren.av.tr\/blog\/2021\/01\/19\/hakimin-vekilin-mazeret-dilekcesini-delillendirmesini-istemeden-mazereti-reddetmesi-bozma-sebebidir\/","title":{"rendered":"Mazeretin Delillendirilmesi \u0130\u00e7in Vekile S\u00fcre Verilmemesi Bozma Sebebidir"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>T.C.<br \/>\nYARGITAY<br \/>\nONYED\u0130NC\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">ESAS\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 : 2020\/45<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR\u00a0 : 2020\/3568<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">TAR\u0130H\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 : 17.06.2020<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>TASARRUFUN \u0130PTAL\u0130 DAVASI<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>HAK\u0130M\u0130N VEK\u0130L\u0130N MAZERET D\u0130LEK\u00c7ES\u0130N\u0130 DEL\u0130LLEND\u0130RMES\u0130<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>HAK\u0130M\u0130N MAZERET\u0130 DEL\u0130LLEND\u0130RMEK \u00dcZERE S\u00dcRE VEREREK VE KARARIN DA DAVACIYA TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130 SA\u011eLAYARAK S\u00dcRE SONUNDA KARAR VERMES\u0130 GEREK\u0130R<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.corpus.com.tr\/\">6100 s. Hukuk Muhakemeleri K<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.corpus.com.tr\/\">150<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.corpus.com.tr\/\">2004 s. \u0130\u0130K<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.corpus.com.tr\/\">277<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00d6ZET<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px; text-align: justify;\"><em>Davac\u0131 vekili 12.06.2019 tarihli mazeret dilek\u00e7esinde \u201cYozgat mahkemelerinde duru\u015fmalar\u0131m bulundu\u011fundan duru\u015fmaya i\u015ftirak edilemeyece\u011fi, Duru\u015fma g\u00fcn ve saatinin Uyap \u00fczerinden \u00f6\u011frenilece\u011fi\u201d belirtilmi\u015ftir. Mahkemece 13.06.2019 tarihli duru\u015fmada davac\u0131n\u0131n mazeret dilek\u00e7esinin belgeli olmamas\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi ile reddine, davac\u0131n\u0131n duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcnden haberdar olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n davay\u0131 takip etmedi\u011finden 13.06.2019 tarihinde HMK 150 maddesi uyar\u0131nca yenileninceye kadar dosyan\u0131n i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015fse de mahkemece verilen karar do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131 vekilinin (avukat\u0131n) ba\u015fka bir \u015fehirde ba\u015fka bir adliyede duru\u015fmas\u0131 olmas\u0131 hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na uygundur. Mahkemece davac\u0131n\u0131n mazeret beyan\u0131na g\u00f6re, mazeretini delillendirmek \u00fczere s\u00fcre vererek ve s\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131n da davac\u0131ya tebli\u011fini sa\u011flayarak s\u00fcre sonunda karar verilmesi gerekirken, delil ibraz\u0131 istenmeksizin dosyan\u0131n i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p sonras\u0131nda da davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f say\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesi isabetli de\u011fildir.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px; text-align: justify;\">MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px; text-align: justify;\">Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tasarrufun iptali davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonunda; kararda yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerden dolay\u0131 davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f say\u0131lmas\u0131na dair verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>&#8211; K A R A R-<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 vekili, dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bor\u00e7lu &#8230; \u0130n\u015faat Taah. Mad. Nak. San Tic. Ltd. \u015eti\u2019ne kredi kulland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131 &#8230;\u2019\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu kredilerde m\u00fc\u015ftereken ve m\u00fcteselsilen sorumlulu\u011funun bulundu\u011funu, kredi borcunun \u00f6denmedi\u011fini, daval\u0131 bor\u00e7lu aleyhine Yozgat 2. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn 2012\/1189 say\u0131l\u0131 dosya ile icra takibi ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131 bor\u00e7lunun ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 gayr\u0131menkullerin di\u011fer daval\u0131lara devredildi\u011finin tespit edildi\u011fini beyan ederek daval\u0131lar aras\u0131ndaki tasarruflar\u0131n iptalini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 &#8230; ve &#8230; vekili davan\u0131n reddini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece: davac\u0131n\u0131n, duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcnden haberdar olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n davay\u0131 takip etmedi\u011finden, 13\/06\/2019 tarihinde HMK.&#8217;nun 150.maddesi uyar\u0131nca yenileninceye kadar &#8220;dosyan\u0131n i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten ba\u015flayarak da \u00fc\u00e7 ay i\u00e7erisinde yenilenmedi\u011finden, HMK.&#8217;nun 150\/5.maddesi gere\u011fince &#8220;davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f say\u0131lmas\u0131na&#8221; karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava, \u0130\u0130K 277 ve devam\u0131 maddelerine g\u00f6re a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f tasarrufun iptali davas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 vekili 12.06.2019 tarihli mazeret dilek\u00e7esinde \u201cYozgat mahkemelerinde duru\u015fmalar\u0131m bulundu\u011fundan duru\u015fmaya i\u015ftirak edilemeyece\u011fi, Duru\u015fma g\u00fcn ve saatinin Uyap \u00fczerinden \u00f6\u011frenilece\u011fi\u201d belirtilmi\u015ftir. Mahkemece 13.06.2019 tarihli duru\u015fmada davac\u0131n\u0131n mazeret dilek\u00e7esinin belgeli olmamas\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi ile reddine, davac\u0131n\u0131n duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcnden haberdar olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n davay\u0131 takip etmedi\u011finden 13.06.2019 tarihinde HMK 150 maddesi uyar\u0131nca yenileninceye kadar dosyan\u0131n i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015fse de mahkemece verilen karar do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 vekilinin (avukat\u0131n) ba\u015fka bir \u015fehirde ba\u015fka bir adliyede duru\u015fmas\u0131 olmas\u0131 hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na uygundur. Mahkemece davac\u0131n\u0131n mazeret beyan\u0131na g\u00f6re, mazeretini delillendirmek \u00fczere s\u00fcre vererek ve s\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131n da davac\u0131ya tebli\u011fini sa\u011flayarak s\u00fcre sonunda karar verilmesi gerekirken, delil ibraz\u0131 istenmeksizin dosyan\u0131n i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p sonras\u0131nda da davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f say\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesi isabetli de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle davac\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan harc\u0131n istek halinde temyiz eden davac\u0131ya geri verilmesine 17.06.2020 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kaynak:www.corpus.com.tr<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C. YARGITAY ONYED\u0130NC\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 ESAS\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 : 2020\/45 KARAR\u00a0 : 2020\/3568 TAR\u0130H\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 : 17.06.2020 TASARRUFUN \u0130PTAL\u0130 DAVASI HAK\u0130M\u0130N VEK\u0130L\u0130N MAZERET D\u0130LEK\u00c7ES\u0130N\u0130 DEL\u0130LLEND\u0130RMES\u0130 HAK\u0130M\u0130N MAZERET\u0130 DEL\u0130LLEND\u0130RMEK \u00dcZERE S\u00dcRE VEREREK VE KARARIN DA DAVACIYA TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130 SA\u011eLAYARAK S\u00dcRE SONUNDA KARAR VERMES\u0130 GEREK\u0130R 6100 s. Hukuk Muhakemeleri K 150 2004 s. \u0130\u0130K 277 \u00d6ZET&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,3],"tags":[11,15,9,10,13,12,14],"class_list":["post-87","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-tum-yazilar","category-yargitay-kararlari","tag-bozma","tag-karari","tag-mazereti","tag-red","tag-sure","tag-teblig","tag-yargitay"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/suren.av.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/suren.av.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/suren.av.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/suren.av.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/suren.av.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/suren.av.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":101,"href":"https:\/\/suren.av.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87\/revisions\/101"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/suren.av.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/suren.av.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/suren.av.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}